◆ The Charter · live custodian record vs the S&P 500
Does it beat the S&P 500 — with less of the downside?
One question, measured period by period on custodian-reported NAV against the S&P 500 total return. No other scorecard.
◆ Since inception · cumulative, custodian-reported NAV
The Charter Standard measures the full 80/20 + engine architecture against the S&P 500 total return. This account currently runs the engine sleeve only, so the gates are armed but not yet measuring. Measurement begins the day the account composition matches the published architecture — and that start date is published here.
Source: Interactive Brokers Flex Query · NAV as reported by custodian · benchmark: S&P 500 Total Return · last sync — · raw file sha256 —
◆ Period
◆ Window
Every period vs the S&P 500 total return
—
Upside captured · downside avoided
In up periods, how much of the S&P's gain did the strategy capture — and in down periods, how much of its loss did it take?
◆ Growth of 100 · strategy vs S&P 500 total return · peak-to-trough drawdown mirror · custodian-reported NAV
Where the return came from
The account's two sleeves, split by holding — the Intraday Engine (futures, options, non-SPY trades) and the Foundational (SPY) holding. Each shown as its contribution to the account's total return; the two add up to the whole.